Comments on: Abortion Bill Filed in Legislature

By: RMKrebsbach

RMKrebsbach — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:15:55 +0000

I think that is irrelevant to the above article. However, since you seem hung up on the issue, the fact is once the sperm is released into the female body it becomes her PROPERTY…just like clothing, jewelry or anything else you might give a woman.
If you don’t want her to have your sperm…don’t give it to her. OR have a discussion and come to an agreement, have it signed and notarized, on how an unplanned pregnancy will be handled (meaning, “we can have sex, but I won’t be responsible for any children” NOT “you must have an abortion”…you know, cuz we silly females like to change our minds).

Or are you just interested in boinking without thinking about the consequences?

By: RMKrebsbach

RMKrebsbach — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:05:57 +0000

Here are my responses to all the pro-birthers (because I don’t hear any of them raising their hands to financially support the entire population of unwanted children in this country..they just care that they’re born, what happens after that is an argument for how they DON’T want their tax dollars spent – supporting the mother and her child):
“Life begins at conception.”
This is NOT a pro-life argument because you are simply exchanging the rights of a VIABLE life form for the rights of a NON-VIABLE life form; the fetus over the woman. Here’s the definition of life: “a characteristic that distinguishes objects that have self-sustaining biological processes from those that do not.” Want to guess where a fetus fits in? Right…it can’t sustain itself, it cannot reproduce therefore it cannot be considered life, and THAT is what is covered under the Constitution. Freedom, liberty, justice and religion are covered there too. Can it choose religion? Can it choose to emancipate itself from the womb? Are you going to force a fetus to be Christian? Muslim? Catholic? Will you put it in prison it if takes the life of its mother? Stupid, illogical argument.

The information below is cited from CDC data:

FACT: 86.8% (1,100 out of 1,300) of all abortions are performed before medical professionals deem it as a ‘late term’ abortion (12 weeks or more). Partial birth abortions account for less than 1% of abortions (.17% OR 2 for every 1,300 abortions). Late term, let alone partial birth abortions, are the vast MINORITY of abortions performed in the United States.

FACT: 48% of women stated they had a late term abortion because they had problems OBTAINING AN ABORTION. If you don’t like late term and that is your main objection to abortions you should realize that A.) they are in the VAST minority (13.2% of all abortions) and B.) impeding a woman’s right to choose INCREASES the number of late term abortions. I think it’s only fair to cite the top reason, or 78% of those obtaining a late term abortion, said they didn’t realize they were pregnant or didn’t realize how long they’d been pregnant. This points to an obvious need for better sex education…SEX education, not abstinence education.

By: JDavis

JDavis — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:28:56 +0000

Indeed, the law already recognizes the unborn as human life. Unless I’m mistaken, one can be charged with manslaughter for causing the death of an unborn child in the process of creating a crime.

By: JDavis

JDavis — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:56:30 +0000

>This is not a race issue…it is an economic one

Just as the health Care take over is not a race issue; but an economic one. Bad economics, these health care bills proposed by the Democrats.

By: JDavis

JDavis — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:53:59 +0000

>First they should pass a groundbreaking law allowing retroactive abortions of the religious-right monsters, who make the Taliban seem like Sesame Street characters.

Reply
peg says:
March 2, 2010 at 12:21 amWe can dream.

Now we know you two are bigots.

By: JDavis

JDavis — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:51:07 +0000

Robin, AND you agree that the sperm donor (since we’re using inoculous verbiage) should have the opportunity to support or remove himself from the life/responsibility of said fetus when informed that it exists, right? The man gets the same opportunity to be responsible, or wash his hands of the situation?

By: JDavis

JDavis — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:48:04 +0000

AND you agree that a man should have the option when informed that conception has occured, to either accept responsibility for the child or to remove himself from the situation permanently, right?

By: sandy

sandy — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:48:05 +0000

plenty ways of not getting pregnant nowadays, we got an instrument fitted into wifes womb, didnt get pregnant the 10 years ,it was in by choice when we wanted another child we got it removed and conceived right away, easy to plan why dont you lot ???

By: JDavis

JDavis — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:20:18 +0000

“Why is it OK for Big Government to be in the WOMBS of American women”

The you agree that a man should not be saddled with child support payments for a child he doesn’t want, right?

By: JDavis

JDavis — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:18:57 +0000

For those who posture that a woman should not have to endure a pregnancy they don’t want: do you agree that a man shouldn’t have to pay for the support of a child they on’t want?