<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rubio&#8217;s Use of State Party Credit Card Stirs Controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jaxobserver.com/2010/02/25/rubios-use-of-rpof-credit-card-causes-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jaxobserver.com/2010/02/25/rubios-use-of-rpof-credit-card-causes-controversy/</link>
	<description>Your Independent Alternative!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:20:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: More to the Story...</title>
		<link>http://www.jaxobserver.com/2010/02/25/rubios-use-of-rpof-credit-card-causes-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-10734</link>
		<dc:creator>More to the Story...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaxobserver.com/?p=10273#comment-10734</guid>
		<description>Sorry, there is a typo above. Second to the last paragraph, the RPOF is a private organization. I know that is obvious, but I didn&#039;t want to create confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, there is a typo above. Second to the last paragraph, the RPOF is a private organization. I know that is obvious, but I didn&#8217;t want to create confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More to the Story...</title>
		<link>http://www.jaxobserver.com/2010/02/25/rubios-use-of-rpof-credit-card-causes-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-10700</link>
		<dc:creator>More to the Story...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaxobserver.com/?p=10273#comment-10700</guid>
		<description>Rubio’s Double Billing Scheme
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/state/marco-rubio-double-billing-of-flights-was-in-291173.html

For those of you that didn’t catch this article or its significance, I hope you take the time to understand the implications of this new issue. Due to the release of the Rubio’s damaging RPOF AMEX card statements, he is only now coming clean on eight airline tickets that he submitted reimbursement claims to both the RPOF and the State of Florida. Therefore, this scheme doubled his money regarding these expenses.

Oddly enough, in his defense the Rubio Campaign says in this article that they “could find only eight flights between 2006-2008 which were paid for the state,” while “hundreds of flights” were taken during this time frame. So if we are to believe that this was not a deliberate attempt to take advantage of the system, his position, the RPOF contributors and the Florida Tax payers, then we will have to believe that for some reason he changed a reimbursement/expense practice that had been repeated hundreds of times for several years. 

Why would he accidently choose only these eight flights to submit to the State, and not realize as he stumbled through a different reporting process in order to get his money that an error was being made? 

Why is he reimbursing the RPOF and not the State of Florida? 

A cynical reader would surmise that by admitting he should not have submitted the request to the State of Florida, that it would trigger an audit and a criminal investigation in to all reimbursement requests he made to the State. Being exposed to a false reimbursement claim against the State of Florida would be made against a public entity and therefore pursued by proper legal authorities. An “accidental” submittal to the RPOF may be forgiven, as it is not a private organization and the “oversight” would avoid criminal investigation.

When something just doesn’t make sense, there is usually more to the story. It seems as if this ball of yarn is just now beginning to unravel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rubio’s Double Billing Scheme<br />
<a href="http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/state/marco-rubio-double-billing-of-flights-was-in-291173.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/state/marco-rubio-double-billing-of-flights-was-in-291173.html</a></p>
<p>For those of you that didn’t catch this article or its significance, I hope you take the time to understand the implications of this new issue. Due to the release of the Rubio’s damaging RPOF AMEX card statements, he is only now coming clean on eight airline tickets that he submitted reimbursement claims to both the RPOF and the State of Florida. Therefore, this scheme doubled his money regarding these expenses.</p>
<p>Oddly enough, in his defense the Rubio Campaign says in this article that they “could find only eight flights between 2006-2008 which were paid for the state,” while “hundreds of flights” were taken during this time frame. So if we are to believe that this was not a deliberate attempt to take advantage of the system, his position, the RPOF contributors and the Florida Tax payers, then we will have to believe that for some reason he changed a reimbursement/expense practice that had been repeated hundreds of times for several years. </p>
<p>Why would he accidently choose only these eight flights to submit to the State, and not realize as he stumbled through a different reporting process in order to get his money that an error was being made? </p>
<p>Why is he reimbursing the RPOF and not the State of Florida? </p>
<p>A cynical reader would surmise that by admitting he should not have submitted the request to the State of Florida, that it would trigger an audit and a criminal investigation in to all reimbursement requests he made to the State. Being exposed to a false reimbursement claim against the State of Florida would be made against a public entity and therefore pursued by proper legal authorities. An “accidental” submittal to the RPOF may be forgiven, as it is not a private organization and the “oversight” would avoid criminal investigation.</p>
<p>When something just doesn’t make sense, there is usually more to the story. It seems as if this ball of yarn is just now beginning to unravel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Another Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.jaxobserver.com/2010/02/25/rubios-use-of-rpof-credit-card-causes-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-10624</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Another Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaxobserver.com/?p=10273#comment-10624</guid>
		<description>And what real job has Crist had?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what real job has Crist had?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Another Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.jaxobserver.com/2010/02/25/rubios-use-of-rpof-credit-card-causes-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-10623</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Another Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaxobserver.com/?p=10273#comment-10623</guid>
		<description>Gee I don&#039;t want to rain on the Rubio bash party, but Crist put his guy Greer in at RPOF,  Greer decided who got the cards and what the rules were,   Greer paid the bills and apparently didn&#039;t dispute the charges at the time.  Now someone leaked the info on only one of the numerous cards, Rubio&#039;s.  The Speaker of the House had a card.  The President of the Senate had a card.  Did the Governor and the LG have a card too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee I don&#8217;t want to rain on the Rubio bash party, but Crist put his guy Greer in at RPOF,  Greer decided who got the cards and what the rules were,   Greer paid the bills and apparently didn&#8217;t dispute the charges at the time.  Now someone leaked the info on only one of the numerous cards, Rubio&#8217;s.  The Speaker of the House had a card.  The President of the Senate had a card.  Did the Governor and the LG have a card too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Davies</title>
		<link>http://www.jaxobserver.com/2010/02/25/rubios-use-of-rpof-credit-card-causes-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-10607</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaxobserver.com/?p=10273#comment-10607</guid>
		<description>Poor Marco. Apparently never holding a real job and earning an honest living caught up with the Golden One. Of course he used the card for personal expenses, did you expect him to be able to live off of the pittance we pay our state legislators? That is why Sansom, Haridopolous and the rest set themselves up with BS jobs at the very places they control funding for. I still would have liked to have seen Marco speak to all of the unemployed families had he been Governor and turned down the stimulus on principle. He could have told him that worn out story of his Grandparents and their hard work. This guy has been in politics since his days in Law School. Go get a real job Marco and see what it is like to be one of the people you purport to so well represent. What a joke!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Marco. Apparently never holding a real job and earning an honest living caught up with the Golden One. Of course he used the card for personal expenses, did you expect him to be able to live off of the pittance we pay our state legislators? That is why Sansom, Haridopolous and the rest set themselves up with BS jobs at the very places they control funding for. I still would have liked to have seen Marco speak to all of the unemployed families had he been Governor and turned down the stimulus on principle. He could have told him that worn out story of his Grandparents and their hard work. This guy has been in politics since his days in Law School. Go get a real job Marco and see what it is like to be one of the people you purport to so well represent. What a joke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://www.jaxobserver.com/2010/02/25/rubios-use-of-rpof-credit-card-causes-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-10580</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaxobserver.com/?p=10273#comment-10580</guid>
		<description>Rubio Supporters, sounding more and more like Obama-zombies every day.

Poor baby, it is a hit job to release the Party Credit card statements. Clearly Rubio was protecting something because he has been fighting the release since the beginning.

Interesting that the people who support Sharon Day were also supporting the release of the records (because they thought it would hurt Jim Greer) I wonder how many will change their tune because of Rubio now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rubio Supporters, sounding more and more like Obama-zombies every day.</p>
<p>Poor baby, it is a hit job to release the Party Credit card statements. Clearly Rubio was protecting something because he has been fighting the release since the beginning.</p>
<p>Interesting that the people who support Sharon Day were also supporting the release of the records (because they thought it would hurt Jim Greer) I wonder how many will change their tune because of Rubio now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://www.jaxobserver.com/2010/02/25/rubios-use-of-rpof-credit-card-causes-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-10579</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaxobserver.com/?p=10273#comment-10579</guid>
		<description>We can go to the Rubio Website and get the same load, Nelsa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can go to the Rubio Website and get the same load, Nelsa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://www.jaxobserver.com/2010/02/25/rubios-use-of-rpof-credit-card-causes-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-10578</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaxobserver.com/?p=10273#comment-10578</guid>
		<description>I would not be suprised at all if this were the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not be suprised at all if this were the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.jaxobserver.com/2010/02/25/rubios-use-of-rpof-credit-card-causes-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-10548</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 04:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaxobserver.com/?p=10273#comment-10548</guid>
		<description>Once upon a time Billy Bob Clinton stated in a State of the Union Speech that he would put 100,000 additional police on the streets. A year later, he claimed he did that. About two years out several newsmen noted that only about 30,000 policemen had been added. (Red tape &amp; lack of future funding.) In the 2008 campaign, he claimed he had added about 80,000. A week later, John Edwards claimed he co-sponsored the bill and and had helped put 100,000 policemen on the street.
Moral of the Story: Politicians and numbers don&#039;t add up. (God help us when they are talking millions, billions, and trillions!)
Before we jump to conclusions (One way or the other.), let&#039;s see what the real numbers are, and what&#039;s up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once upon a time Billy Bob Clinton stated in a State of the Union Speech that he would put 100,000 additional police on the streets. A year later, he claimed he did that. About two years out several newsmen noted that only about 30,000 policemen had been added. (Red tape &amp; lack of future funding.) In the 2008 campaign, he claimed he had added about 80,000. A week later, John Edwards claimed he co-sponsored the bill and and had helped put 100,000 policemen on the street.<br />
Moral of the Story: Politicians and numbers don&#8217;t add up. (God help us when they are talking millions, billions, and trillions!)<br />
Before we jump to conclusions (One way or the other.), let&#8217;s see what the real numbers are, and what&#8217;s up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rubio=Hypocrite</title>
		<link>http://www.jaxobserver.com/2010/02/25/rubios-use-of-rpof-credit-card-causes-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-10517</link>
		<dc:creator>Rubio=Hypocrite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaxobserver.com/?p=10273#comment-10517</guid>
		<description>Rubio’s campaign leaked these documents, not Crist…think about it. He knew that Crist either had or could get the statements and would be better served if they came out at the last minute, he knew that RPOF Chairman Thrasher would come under continued pressure to release them until he was finally forced to do so…and he knew that he committed tax evasion, which is truly a federal offense.

Therefore, he was left with the only choice which is to go on the offensive by releasing the information and doing an absurd, over the top PR effort to try and divert attention with his dramatic attacks on Crist. He needed to get the inevitable over with now, take his lumps and hope like hell that people will forget about all this before August. Politically speaking it is really his only reasonable alternative.

As for what happens next, this will break hard one way or another for Rubio. Either people will fall for his ridiculous claim that somehow he is a victim and shouldn’t be at fault for his recklessness and abusive dealings with RPOF contributor funds, or people will see these actions as another reason why Rubio is no conservative and not fiscally responsible. 

So to the undecided voters, put down the Rubio cool aid and step back from the table. You are beginning to learn more about the “Real Rubio” and it isn’t what you have been told.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rubio’s campaign leaked these documents, not Crist…think about it. He knew that Crist either had or could get the statements and would be better served if they came out at the last minute, he knew that RPOF Chairman Thrasher would come under continued pressure to release them until he was finally forced to do so…and he knew that he committed tax evasion, which is truly a federal offense.</p>
<p>Therefore, he was left with the only choice which is to go on the offensive by releasing the information and doing an absurd, over the top PR effort to try and divert attention with his dramatic attacks on Crist. He needed to get the inevitable over with now, take his lumps and hope like hell that people will forget about all this before August. Politically speaking it is really his only reasonable alternative.</p>
<p>As for what happens next, this will break hard one way or another for Rubio. Either people will fall for his ridiculous claim that somehow he is a victim and shouldn’t be at fault for his recklessness and abusive dealings with RPOF contributor funds, or people will see these actions as another reason why Rubio is no conservative and not fiscally responsible. </p>
<p>So to the undecided voters, put down the Rubio cool aid and step back from the table. You are beginning to learn more about the “Real Rubio” and it isn’t what you have been told.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

