web analytics
Your Independent Alternative!

Obama Missed a Great Chance

President Obama had a golden Memorial Day opportunity to show the country that (contrary to his left flank) he is not anti-military and not anti-Christian, by telling Attorney General Eric Holder to order the Park Service to permit volunteer veterans to replace the Mojave Cross that was stolen on May 9. But he let the atheists and those who sneer at our veterans win the day.

It was a test of presidential decision-making, just like Fox News' question as to whether he supports a boycott against Arizona. Remembering that boycotts were a favorite tactic of his pre-senatorial career in community organizing, Obama ducked, saying that, as president, he could not support a boycott and likewise he could not NOT support a boycott.

The homemade 7-foot-tall cross, made from two sections of hollow metal pipe filled with concrete, bolted together and painted white, was erected in a remote spot of the 1.6-million-acre Mojave Desert back in 1934 by the Veterans of Foreign Wars as a memorial to World War I veterans. In order for an atheist to claim he was offended by the sight of the cross on U.S. Park Service property, he would have to travel 10 miles from the nearest highway and 30 miles from the nearest town, across an inhospitable and rocky terrain.

For nine years, the cross has been the target of lawsuits by the ACLU, representing atheists who appeal to supremacist judges to rule that this memorial cross violates the First Amendment and so-called separation of church and state.

In 2001, a federal judge ordered this cross to be covered until the legal issues were finalized. First, it was covered by a large tarp, and later by unpainted plywood, which looked rather like an unsold billboard.

Congress then intervened and transferred to private ownership the small plot of land on which the cross stood. That should have ended the dispute, since obviously a cross can be on private land regardless of how much it annoys the neighbors.

In 2008, the liberal Ninth Circuit again ordered the cross to be removed rather than transferred to private ownership. Forward to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In April this year, the Supreme Court by 5-to-4 reversed the Ninth Circuit along with a remand to review the facts again. It's unfortunate that the high court gave the anti-religion Ninth Circuit another bite at the apple, but the Supreme Court did specifically reject the assertion that the cross automatically violates the Establishment Clause.

The majority decision was written by Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy. He elaborated on the important difference between complete exclusion of religion from the public square and proper enforcement of the Establishment Clause.

Kennedy wrote: "The goal of avoiding governmental endorsement does not require eradication of all religious symbols in the public realm. ... The Constitution does not oblige government to avoid any public acknowledgment of religion's role in society. A relentless and all-pervasive attempt to exclude religion from every aspect of public life could itself become inconsistent with the Constitution."

That ruling should have allowed the Mojave Cross to stand as it had done for 76 years, but two weeks later the cross was stolen. That wasn't an easy theft because the Cross was bolted to its foundation on Sunrise Rock.

The next day, an anonymous letter was delivered to a local newspaper purporting to explain the motive for the theft. The newspaper printed the letter but did not vouch for its authenticity.

The letter-writer falsely claimed that the monument represented "favoritism and exclusion" as well as "discrimination or hatred" against non-Christians. That interpretation was refuted by the majority of the Supreme Court, as well as by the inscription on the cross stating that it honored "the Dead of All Wars."

On May 20, some volunteers installed a near-perfect replica of the original Mojave Cross. The next day, the Park Service removed it, apparently on orders from the Justice Department, and Obama said nothing.

The Mojave Desert cross is only one of dozens of lawsuits by which atheists are trying to get supremacist judges to expunge all crosses and Ten Commandments monuments from sight. A 29-foot cross on San Diego's Mount Soledad, overlooking beautiful La Jolla, has been in litigation since 1989. This appeal is now before a Ninth Circuit panel consisting of two judges appointed by Bill Clinton and a third appointed by Jimmy Carter, all three of whom have previously issued rulings hostile to religion.

The Christian majority in the United States had better wake up to how their religion is under attack by the U.S. executive and judicial branches of the federal government. Only a new legislative branch elected in November can protect the First Amendment from the atheists.

Phyllis Schlafly is a lawyer, conservative political analyst and the author of the newly revised and expanded "Supremacists." She can be contacted by e-mail at phyllis@eagleforum.org. To find out more about Phyllis Schlafly and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Website at www.creators.com.


2 Responses »

  1. Phyllis,
    The stolen Mojave cross can be replaced by something more appropiate for a Veterans Memorial. Veterna served under the flag, not the cross.
    All veterans should be honored.
    No non-Christian has ever had a cross on his/her grave.
    Honor them all! Do the right thing! That is what Jesus would want you to do!
    Jesus loved EVERYONE, remember? Red and yellow, black and white ..
    You KNOW Jesus would want ALL who served to be honored. It's the democratic
    thing to do. If they fought for Jesus, or if being Christian is a requirement for being
    in the miitary, then, a cross could be OK, but it isn't a symbol of the U.S. The flag
    is, so, let's get a flag there and quit whining about not having Christian Rule. The
    military is non-denominational, interfaith. So let's have a flag to represent them.
    It was illegally put on govt. soil. People can't erect whatever symbol they want on
    public land. It should have been removed immediately after it was discovered since
    it wasn't erected legally.

  2. Dear Ms. Schlafly,

    I am one of "those atheists" that you ridicule above. I must admit, I do not appreciate your characterization of me. You lump us all into one pot. Like you, I do not believe in Zeus or Thor. I probably believe in one less god than you do!

    But that aside, I am in favor of removing all religious symbols from government land. All citizens maintain this land through their tax dollars, and they should not be forced to pay for the upkeep of memorials that are, in fact, religious symbols.

    I am not determined to remove crosses and other religious symbols from the entire landscape as you suggest. Every single Christian in this entire country could put a huge cross on their OWN property...adorning their roof, their patio, their front yard....whatever! But, they should not take liberties with property than in fact belongs to all of us.

    Furthermore, as someone from a Jewish family, the Latin cross DOES NOT represent in our hearts and minds the service of my uncles killed in World War II.

    This isn't about me taking sides against Christians. This is me, asking for all of us to abide by the constitution of the United States of America. I wish you could be honest about my motives. You do not need to misrepresent the truth to protect your faith.