web analytics
Your Independent Alternative!

Builders Gear Up to Beat Amendment 4

A constitutional amendment that would put land-use changes before voters is providing its own political kick-start to a Florida development industry staggered by the lengthy economic downturn.

Despite a lousy economy, the loss of 28,000 construction jobs in the past year, and more than 300,000 unsold homes on the market in Florida, developers are rushing to get state approval for dozens of projects that require changing local comprehensive plan standards.

The industry also is putting millions of dollars into political committees fighting Amendment 4 – the so-called Hometown Democracy measure slated to go before voters in November. The measure would require all comp-plan changes to be approved by voters in a local referendum, which builders, governments, school boards and labor unions warn will yield an economic Ice Age in Florida by effectively stopping development.

“Uniformly, our members are very strongly against this,” said John Sebree, a vice-president of Florida Realtors, which pumped $1 million last month into a political committee fighting the amendment. “We’re a pretty bipartisan group. But everybody agrees this is going to change things dramatically.”

The organization spearheading opposition to Amendment 4, Citizens for Lower Taxes and a Stronger Economy, collected $4.7 million in the 3 ½-month period leading to a July 16 campaign finance reporting deadline. Other big donors Pulte Homes Corp., a Michigan-based builder which gave $567,000; $367,000 from Lennar builders in Miami; $440,000 from the Florida Chamber of Commerce, which has long gone to bat for the development industry.

The citizens’ group has raised $5.8 million, according to finance reports – with builders K. Hovnanian of New Jersey and California’s Ryland Corp., and KB Homes among the bigger contributors. A host of Florida business groups also have powered the opposition campaign, including Florida Mainstream Merchants and Florida Power & Light.

Meanwhile, the Florida Department of Community Affairs has been flooded with proposals from local governments seeking to change their comprehensive land-use plans – apparently fueled by builder fear of the potential effect of Amendment 4, which needs approval from 60 percent of voters to become law.

The DCA adopted 29,197 plan amendments approved earlier by local governments in 2009 – more than three times the usual number of proposals the agency formerly received annually. Through mid-May, the latest figure available, more than 2,000 amendments had been sent to DCA from local officials.

Department officials acknowledge that many of the amendments sent to Tallahassee for review are small-bore changes. But the volume of changes sought also indicates that many developers are petitioning local governments to rework plans for projects that may never get built or, at least, will begin groundbreaking only when the economy turns around.

“It’s clear, though, a lot of people are trying to get ahead of Amendment 4,” said James Miller, a DCA spokesman.

Julie Hauserman, with the Florida Hometown Democracy campaign, said the high volume of plan amendments sent to DCA underscores the bond between city and county officials and developers -- who often are the largest contributors to local political campaigns.

“You’ve got to wonder why are local politicians approving comp-plan changes for future development when there’s a recession and empty strip malls across Florida,” Hauserman said.

While Citizens for Lower Taxes and a Stronger Economy has collected $5.7 million, Hometown Democracy through mid-July had collected $1.6 million, with $138,573 coming in the latest quarter. But Hometown Democracy has managed to spend virtually all that it has collected, according to campaign finance reports.

Citizens has bankrolled all but $440,000 for what is likely to prove a heavy television advertising campaign this fall.

The flood of comp-plan amendments and even the sizable contributions coming from building and real estate industries hit hard by the economy are “just another unintended consequence of Amendment 4,” said Ryan Houck, executive director of Citizens for Lower Taxes and a Stronger Economy.

“The whole purpose of Amendment 4 is to kick development proposals into court,” he added. “It’s really just a stimulus package for environmental lawyers.”

But Florida industries financing the opposition acknowledge the spending comes at a bleak time. Sebree, of the Florida Realtors, said his organization, which has 115,000 members, is more than 25 percent smaller than it was at the 2005-06 height of the state’s real estate boom.

The Florida Home Builders Association, with about 10,000 corporate members, is about half of its former size, said Doug Buck, the organization’s director of governmental affairs.

“We are a reflection of the devastation,” Buck said. “But everybody in this state is affected by construction. We’re going to do all we can so citizens understand what this amendment will do to this state’s economy.”

5 Responses »

  1. Thank goodness someone is working to stop this terrible Amendment 4. In the middle of a recession, I can't figure out why we'd want to make it tougher for Florida to attract jobs. VOTE NO on 4!

  2. Vote NO on 4 ...If you want Florida to even begin to recover from poor decisions by poor politicians at our expense.

  3. All the amendment says is that we will ask the people if this is a development they actually want. Undeveloped land does not exist waiting to line a developers pockets. Why would we want to allow developers to build what no one wants built anyway?? I think there are better ways to spend that $4.7 million that would have created good jobs in Florida. I think Amendment 4 sounds like a fair strategy to me.

  4. Voters need a seat at the table. We're the ones who watch tax dollars go to extend the police, fire, water, sewer, schools and roads to new developments. Is a new development worth it? We should get a vote before we're forced to pay.

    Our homes and communities are too important to leave in the hands of politicians, lobbyists hired by developers, and special interests. Together, we can stop rubber-stamped approvals that clog roads, crowd schools, and wreck natural areas. If we all vote yes on Amendment 4, we can take power back for the people.

  5. Politicians sell development as helping "quality of life." Malarkey. Over-development is detrimental to quality of life. Wait 10 or 20 years and every rural and semi-rural area will be in traffic deadlock with greatly raised taxes, and the politicians will be still singing the same song they do today: the more people move here, the more it will add to the tax base and improve quality of life.